AI made every resume look perfect. Now what?
When candidates all look the same on paper, behavioral fit is the only signal left. Korture measures it in 7 minutes.
Powered by 1,016 occupations from the US Department of Labor's O*NET database.
- 1,016
occupations cross-referenced
- 73,308+
work activity scores
- 18,797+
occupational tasks mapped
- 5,538
psychological profiles derived
Your gut is good. Korture catches what it can't.
Your JD says “strong communicator.” What does that actually mean for this role?
We're looking for a Product Lead who can own the roadmap end-to-end, drive cross-functional alignment across engineering, design, and data, and be comfortable with ambiguity as we scale from seed to Series B.
occupations studied
behavioral profiles
"Strong communicator" means different things at a 5-person startup vs. a 500-person enterprise
The same JD phrase maps to different dimensions depending on company stage and role scope
AI cross-checks your JD against behavioral research, not just keyword matching
Deciding before all the data is in
People who get energy from this move fast from research to action, even with gaps
See how every candidate fits. Before the interview.
Priya S.
7-minute scan, no right answers
Pick A or B. Neither is right or wrong. Measures what gives you energy, not what you know.
Strongest
Setting your own direction. Priya prefers figuring things out over being told what to do.
Watch out
Rapid focus shifts. This role needs constant context-switching. Priya pulls toward sustained focus. Worth exploring.
Interview question
Tell me about a time you had to juggle multiple urgent priorities in a single day. What did you do first, and what did you let wait?
Your brief is built on validated behavioral science, not AI guesswork.
Your inputs
Your JD
Parsed for behavioral signals, not keywords
"Own the roadmap end-to-end" → Setting your own direction
Company context
Same title, different company = different brief
Pre-seed startup vs. enterprise = different energy demands
Sharpening questions
Two quick picks that shift the entire brief
"Deep work or collaboration?" shifted 2 of 5 dimensions
Our research
1,016 occupations cross-referenced
U.S. Dept of Labor O*NET database
Every role calibrated against federal occupational research
73,308+ work activity scores
Calibrate behavioral demand levels per role
Importance and level ratings mapped to behavioral dimensions
18,797+ occupational tasks mapped
Real tasks linked to behavioral dimensions
Each task traced to specific work activities and demand patterns
5,538 psychological profiles
Occupation-level profiles from occupational science
Same dimension gets a unique profile per role context, not a fixed template
AI behavioral analysis
Cross-references all sources, asks follow-ups
Detects contradictions between JD language and sharpening answers
Don't have a JD yet?
Describe the role
We need someone who can own the product roadmap, work directly with customers, and make fast decisions with incomplete data.
Day-to-day, is this more...
Generated JD
Before you search, we check the math.
Screen 0+ people against this brief. Here's what you'd find:
Why this is hard to hire for
"Setting your own direction" and "Being 'on' for people outside the company" rarely coexist. These energy patterns pull in opposite directions.
7 minutes. No right answers. AI can't game it.
Skills tests are searchable. Interview prep is coachable. What gives you energy isn't.
What AI can fake
- Skills tests
- Coding challenges
- Written interview answers
- Cover letters
- Resume bullet points
What AI can't fake
- Forced-choice preferences (pick A or B, both valid)
- No correct answers to search for
- Measures what gives you energy, not knowledge
- Seeded randomization catches gaming patterns
People with the right skills but the wrong behavioral fit quit, disengage, or burn out. Every time.
What hiring tools get wrong, and what we do instead.
Changes per role
Compare with others
Shows trade-offs
Compare with others
Evidence shown
Compare with others
AI-proof
Compare with others
Candidate time
Compare with others
Price
Compare with others
Free to start. Pay only when you're hiring.
A wrong hire costs 30% of first-year salary. 20 scans cost $80.